Home | City Services | Ortonville EDA | Community | Calendar | Ortonville History

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE ORTONVILLE CITY COUNCIL

COUNTY OF BIG STONE, STATE OF MINNESOTA

MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 7:00 P.M.

SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER

 

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:

Mayor Dinnel called the regular meeting of the Ortonville City Council to order at 7:00 P.M.  Roll call was taken with the following being present: Mike Dorry, Artie Arndt, Lenore Sellin, Lisa Berkner, Mel Reinke with the following absent:  Dan Oakes.  City Staff Present: Char Grossman, Curt Hormann, Mark Brown.  Others present:  Tom Koop, Jerry Jorgenson, Elsie Perrine, Vicki Oakes, Tom Oakes, Karen Oakes, Arloa Ronglien, Todd Verheul, Sara Verheul.  Media present:  Holly Hilbrands, Ryan Stattelman.

 

AGENDA AMENDMENTS:                     

A motion was offered by Arndt and seconded by Sellin and did pass unanimously to approve the agenda as amended:

 

Additions:

 

Unfinished Business

12.c     Hilltop Addition Sanitary Sewer           

12.d     Marina Dock Report

12.e     Park Board – Granite along Lakeside Park

12.f      DNR Fisheries Location

 

New Business:

13.f      Marina Dock Benches

13.g     Otter Tail Property

13.h     Park Dumpsters

 

Deletions:

 

New Business:

13.d     Tire Storage – Behind Cashtown Service

 

BIDS:

Bids for the 2004 Seal Coat project were opened and one bid was received in the amount of $20,000.00 from Bituminous Paving, Inc.  A motion was made by Dinnel and seconded by Reinke and the motion did pass unanimously to refer the matter to the Street Committee for further deliberation and recommendations.

 

Bids for the 2004 Street Rehabilitation Project were opened and one bid was received in the amount of $3,500.00 from Highway Improvement, Inc.  A motion was made by Reinke and seconded by Dorry and the motion did pass unanimously to refer the matter to the Street Committee for further deliberation and recommendations.

 

RECOGNITIONS/PRESENTATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS:

Todd Verheul, representing the Airport Board, updated the council on the process of interviewing engineering firms.  Three firms have been interviewed and the board is recommending Short, Elliott & Hendrickson, Inc. for the completion of an Airport Layout Plan-Master Plan.  Upon the recommendation of the Airport Board, a motion was made by Reinke and seconded by Berkner and the motion did pass unanimously to secure the engineering firm of Short, Elliott & Hendrickson, Inc. for the completion of the Airport Layout Plan-Master Plan.

 

Tom Koop, Larson, Allen, Weishair & Co., reviewed the 2003 financial audit of the City of Ortonville and distributed the draft copy for council members to review.  Ortonville is in a good financial condition considering the LGA cuts and have even improved compared to 2002.  Tom is recommending that the council make a decision in the fall regarding the type of audit that will be done for 2004.  Since Ortonville is a town of less than 2,500 we are not required to comply with the GASB 34 regulations but it may be a way of better tracking assets of the City.  The cost of a GASB audit would be approximately an additional $5,000 for the first year.

 

CONSENT AGENDA:

Dinnel asked if there were any additions, corrections, or deletions to be made to the Consent Agenda.

            Deletions -13.a  Corn Festival Fire Works

Motion was made by Reinke and seconded by Berkner, to approve the Consent Agenda which included the following items:

 

9.a                   Motion approving proposed council minutes of May 3, 2004.

 

9.b                   Motion approving proposed special council minutes of May 7, 2004.

 

11.a                 Reinke moved and Berkner seconded that the following resolution be adopted:

 

RESOLUTION 04-033

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF CHLORIDE ON RITA ROAD

 

BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Ortonville that Big Stone County applies chloride to Rita Road for dust control as recommended by the Street Committee in the amount of $600 be and is hereby approved.

 

Upon roll call vote the following voted aye: Sellin, Berkner, Dinnel, Arndt, Dorry, Reinke and the following voted nay: none.

 

Resolution 04-033 passed this 17th day of May 2004.

 

                                                APPROVED:

                                               

                                                                                    ____________________       

David Dinnel,

Mayor

 

ATTEST:

 

_____________________

Charleen K. Grossman,

City Clerk-Administrator

 

13.b                 Motion approving Health Care Foundation Board raffle permit for Oak Tree Classic on September 11, 2004.

 

13.c                 Reinke moved and Berkner seconded that the following resolution be adopted:

RESOLUTION 04-034

BUSINESS SUBSIDY POLICY

A BUSINESS SUBSIDY POLICY FOR TRADITIONAL BUSINESS SUBSIDY

and

JOBZ BUSINESS SUBSIDY DEVELOPMENTS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

RESOLUTION

    OF THE

                         CITY OF ORTONVILLE

 

Its Resolution #04-034 entitled

   “Business Subsidy Policy and Criteria”

May 17, 2004 

RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ortonville that it shall adopt the following Business Subsidy Policy and Criteria:

Preamble.  Whenever the City of Ortonville invests public funds or agrees to voluntarily forfeit tax or other revenue that benefit private development projects, those projects should create the greatest number of FTE jobs that pay a living wage possible for the residents of the City of Ortonville and the surrounding region.  City of Ortonville policy makers and economic development agents must keep the critical need for living wage FTE jobs the priority whenever public dollars are invested in a private business or development project. 

Business Subsidy Public Purpose.   The public purposes of this policy shall be to accomplish the following on behalf of the City of Ortonville:

A.     Enhance economic growth in this area

B.     Create high quality job growth in this area

C.     Retain high quality jobs in this area

D.     Stabilize the community

E.      Other specified purpose

This policy is adopted in compliance with M.S. § 116J.994 Subd. 2.  A copy of the policy shall be submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development along with the first annual Business Subsidy report. 

Principles of Business Subsidy Implementation.   The City of Ortonville shall target its business subsidy assistance to businesses that demonstrate a clear and ongoing commitment to the community by providing living wage jobs to their employees and to City of Ortonville residents, where applicable, by giving priority to those businesses over businesses that have not traditionally paid living wages. 

The City of Ortonville shall focus its business subsidy assistance only to businesses which agree to comply with annual business subsidy reporting requirements as required by Job Opportunity Building Zone (JOBZ) statute M.S. §§ 469.310 - 469.320; and/or as required by the Business Subsidy statute M.S. §§ 116J.993 - 116J.995.

All other things being equal and to the extent legally possible, the City of Ortonville shall give preferential treatment for business subsidies to businesses that engage in responsible labor relations defined as neutrality on union organizing.

Although the primary purpose of this policy is the creation of living wage jobs, we cannot achieve our economic development goals without a trained and ready workforce and adequate childcare.  The City of Ortonville shall commit to assist businesses to obtain trained and work-ready employees through the DEED Workforce Development Centers; MNSCU and other services; and to facilitate access to childcare.

The City of Ortonville agrees to require that a qualified business shall not compete with or displace local businesses currently operating within the subzone community.

 

I.  DEFINITIONS

 

“Authorized Business Subsidy Signatory” means Economic Development Authority who is authorized by this Policy to execute business subsidy agreements on behalf of the City of Ortonville.

“JOBZ Business Subsidy” means tax exemptions or tax credits available to a qualified business located in a job zone under the Job Opportunity Building Zone (JOBZ) statute M.S. §§ 469.310 - 469.320. JOBZ Business (OPTIONAL SECTION) Subsidies shall include:

A.     Exemption from individual income taxes as provided under M.S. § 469.316; and

B.     Exemption from corporate franchise taxes as provided under M.S. § 469.317; and

C.     Exemption from the state sales and use tax and any local sales and use taxes on qualifying purchases as provided in M.S. § 297A.68, subdivision 37; and

D.     Exemption from the state sales tax on motor vehicles and any local sales tax on motor vehicles as provided under M.S. § 297B.03; and

E.      Exemption from the property tax as provided in M.S. § 272.02, subdivision 64; and

F.      Exemption from the wind energy production tax under M.S. § 272.029, subdivision 7; and

G.     The jobs credit allowed under M.S. § 469.318.

 

“Business Subsidy” means a state or local government agency grant, contribution of personal property, real property, infrastructure, the principal amount of a loan at rates below those commercially available to the recipient, any reduction or deferral of any tax or any fee, any guarantee of any payment under any loan, lease, or other obligation, or any preferential use of government facilities given to a business, and as defined by the Business Subsidy statute M.S. §§ 116J.993 - 116J.995.  Business subsidies shall include, but not be limited to: 

 

H.     Loan

I.        Grant

J.       Tax abatement

K.    TIF or other tax reduction or deferral

L.      Guarantee of payment

M.    Contribution of property or infrastructure

N.    Preferential use of governmental facilities

O.    Land contribution

P.      Other specified subsidy.

 

Business subsidies do not include the following:

Q.    assistance of less than $25,000.

R.     assistance that is generally available to all businesses or to a general class of similar businesses, such as a line of businesses, size, location or similar general criteria;

S.      public improvements to buildings or lands owned by the City of Ortonville that serve a public purpose and do not principally benefit a single business or defined group of businesses at the time the improvements are made;

T.      property polluted by contaminants being redeveloped as defined in M.S. § 116J.552, subd. 3.

U.     assistance provided for the sole purpose of renovating old or decaying building stock or bringing it up to code and assistance to designated historic preservation sites or districts, provided that the assistance is equal to or less than 50% of the total cost of the development;

V.     assistance to provide job readiness and training services;

W.    assistance for housing;

X.     assistance for pollution control or abatement, including assistance from a TIF hazardous substances subdistrict;

Y.     assistance for energy conservation;

Z.      tax reductions resulting from conformity with federal tax law;

AA.    workers compensation and unemployment compensation;

BB.    benefits derived from regulation;

CC.    indirect benefits derived from assistance to educational institutions;

DD.    funds from bonds allocated under M.S., Chapter 47A refunding bonds and 501(c)(3) bonds;

EE.    assistance for collaboration between a Minnesota higher education institution and a business;

FF.    assistance for a tax increment financing soils condition district as defined under M.S.469.174, subd.19;

GG.    redevelopment when the Recipients or Qualified Business’ investment in the purchase of the site and in site preparation is 70 percent or more of the assessor’s current years estimated market value;

HH.    general changes in tax increment financing law and other general tax law changes of a principally technical nature;

II.     federal assistance until the assistance has been repaid to and reinvested by the local governmental unit;

JJ.    funds from dock or wharf bonds issued by a seaway port authority;

KK.    business loans or loan guarantees of $75,000 or less; and

LL.    federal loan funds provided through the U.S. Economic Development Administration.

 

“Business Subsidy Report” means the annual reports submitted each year for each business receiving a business subsidy in the community.  The report is submitted by the LGU in order to comply with M.S. § 116J.994 Subd. 7. (b).

“Criteria” means the equitably applied, uniform standards by which the Economic Development Agent and /or the City of Ortonville bases its decision to award any business subsidy to a private business or development project establishing a business and creating jobs in the City of Ortonville. 

“DEED” means Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.

“Economic Development Agent” means the City of Ortonville department, local or regional economic development agency or other authorized entity that is empowered to solicit, negotiate and form business subsidy agreements on behalf of the City of OrtonvilleThe Economic Development Agent for the City of Ortonville shall be the Economic Development Authority, hereinafter “Agent”.

“Health Insurance” means basic group health insurance that is available to full time employees of the recipient. 

“Living Wage Job” shall mean a job which pays wages and health benefits that total at least the rate of 110% of the current poverty level for a family of four.

“Local Governmental Unit” hereinafter LGU, means the statutory or home rule charter City of Ortonville, county, town, iron range resources and rehabilitation agency, regional development commission.

“Operation Start Date” shall mean the date by which the business begins its operations in the zone as evidenced by constructing a facility or relocating to an existing building in a facility and beginning revenue generating operations and/or hiring employees.

“Qualified Business” means a person that carries on a trade or business at a place of business located within a Job Opportunity Building Zone as referenced in M.S. § 469.310 Subd. 11; and complies with the reporting requirements specified by M.S. § 469.313 Subd. 2. (5); and shall comply with the criteria in Section II.C. of this agreement; and shall also mean “Recipient” as defined by Business Subsidy law.  A qualified business shall not include a retail business, a low-wage service business, an agricultural production business, or a business that pays less than the living wage defined in this agreement.

“Recipient” mean any business entity that receives a business subsidy as defined by M.S. § 116J.993, and that has signed a Business Subsidy Agreement with the City of Ortonville.

“Relocating Business” A business relocating from another Minnesota non-JOB Zone location.        

“Relocation Agreement” means a binding written agreement between a relocating qualified business and the commissioner of DEED pledging that the qualified business shall either:  (a) increase full-time or full-time equivalent employment in the first full year of operation within the job opportunity building zone by at least 20 percent, or (b) make a capital investment on the property equivalent to 10% of the gross revenues of operation that was relocated in the immediately preceding taxable year; and provides for repayment of all tax benefits if the requirements of (a) or (b) are not met.

“Subzone” means the parcel or parcel of land designated by the Commissioner of Employment and Economic Development within a Job Opportunity Building Zone within the boundaries of Ortonville to receive certain tax credits and exemptions specified under M.S. § 469.310-469.320.

“Zone” means a Job Opportunity Building Zone or an Agricultural Processing Facility Zone designated by the commissioner of Employment and Economic Development under M.S. § 469.314.

 

 

II.  BUSINESS SUBSIDY REQUIREMENTS

MM.    Business Subsidy Policies.  The City of Ortonville adopts the following:

1.       Any time the City of Ortonville provides a business subsidy to a Qualified Business or recipient, that business is subject to the wage levels, job creation and other criteria set forth in this policy and specified in the Business Subsidy Agreement made with the LGU.  In the event of a conflict between the requirements of the Business Subsidy statute M.S. §§ 116J.993 - 116J.995 and the JOBZ statute M.S. §§ 469.310 - 469.320, the JOBZ statute shall supersede.

2.       The recipient, in the case of a quantifiable non-JOBZ business subsidy, shall create and/or retain at least one full-time living wage job and which provides basic health benefits as committed within the JOBZ policy for each $25,000 of business subsidy received.  These jobs shall be created not later than a date mutually agreed upon by the LGU and recipient.

3.       The qualified business, in the case of a JOBZ business subsidy that is non-quantifiable at the time of the Business Subsidy Agreement, must create and retain for the period of the Job Zone duration or until December 31, 2015, all of the jobs committed to in the Business Subsidy Agreement. These jobs shall be created not later than a specific date identified in a Business Subsidy Agreement.

4.       The qualified business shall be identified in the Business Subsidy Agreement as a:

a.      Trade or business located in and operating in a JOBZ or APF Zone at the time of Zone designation; OR

b.      New trade or business start-up located with the subzone; OR

c.       Business expanding in the subzone which is a business that maintains its current operations in its current location and is expanding its operations and its payroll within the City of Ortonville subzone; OR

d.      A business relocating from another state; OR

e.       A business relocating from another Minnesota non-Zone location specifying the City of Ortonville.

5.       The City of Ortonville may deviate from wage and job criteria in Section II, by documenting the reason in writing for the deviation and attaching a copy of this reason to the next annual Business Subsidy Report submitted to DEED.

6.       The City of Ortonville shall have as its overall GOAL that 100% of new FTE jobs created under this policy shall be held by City of Ortonville residents.  It is expected that all qualified businesses or recipients shall have a quantified target for the number of residents to be hired.

7.       The City Council of Ortonville authorizes the Mayor and EDA President, as representatives of the City to act as its Authorized Business Subsidy Signatories to execute business subsidy agreements on behalf of the City of Ortonville.

NN.    The City Council of Ortonville authorizes EDA President to act as its Economic Development Agent for purposes of marketing, initiating and negotiating Business Subsidy Agreements and executing Business Subsidy Agreements on its behalf.

OO.    Requirements of businesses.  The City of Ortonville of shall require all businesses receiving a business subsidy to comply with the following:

1.       The business shall attend a properly noticed public hearing held by the City of Ortonville as provided by M.S. § 116J.994, when the value of the subsidy does or is expected to exceed $100,000 from local sources.  The purpose of the hearing shall be to identify and define the criteria that the qualified business or recipient shall meet in order to be eligible to receive a business subsidy or become a qualified business for purposes of the JOBZ statute. The hearing shall specify the subsidy provided, public purpose(s) that shall be achieved by offering the subsidy, and shall specify the measurable, specific, and tangible goals committed to by the qualified business.  As provided by M.S. 116J.994, Subd. 5., a public notice shall be published in print and if possible, on the internet, at least 10 days prior to the hearing, identifying the location, date, time, and place of the hearing and providing information about the business subsidy proposed, including a summary of the terms of the subsidy.

2.       If the business is qualified to receive JOBZ tax benefits, that business shall agree to continue to operations in the jurisdiction where the subsidy is used (the subzone) for the duration of the job zone term.

3.       If the qualified business or recipient is a relocating business under the definition in this agreement, the business shall be required to enter into a binding written Relocation Agreement between the qualified business and the commissioner of DEED pledging that the qualified relocating business shall: 

(a)              Commit to signing a Relocation Agreement with DEED; and

(b)              Increase full time employment by 20% (measured relative to the operations that were relocated) within the first full taxable year of operation within the Zone and maintains the required level of employment during each year of zone designation; and/or

(c)              Make a capital investment in the Zone equivalent to at least 10% of gross revenues for the taxable year immediately preceding relocation to the Zone.

d.            The business shall identify an operation start date when business operations for the proposed qualified business are planned to begin in the zone. The date when business operations begin is called the “operation start date”.

           

PP.    Application Fee

1.       Applicants for JOBZ Business Subsidies are subject to an application fee of ½ of 1% of the past year’s business payroll (if an existing business) or the first year’s projected payroll (if a new business).

2.       This fee is payable upon signing the Business Subsidy Agreement between the LGU and the Recipient.

 

QQ.    Reporting Fee

1.      The recipient is obligated to pay an annual fee to the LGU in the amount of $200. This fee is meant      to offset the cost of completing and submitting the Business Assistance Report required by the State. Due payable annually by January 31st.

2.      All information about the Recipient required to complete the Business Assistance Report must be provided to the LGU annually by January 31st for the previous calendar year for the duration of the requirements of the Business Subsidy Law or the JOBZ Law.

RR.    Related Development Costs

1.       Cost, which may be assessed back to the business for the construction, extension or expansion will be negotiated between the LGU and the recipient.

2.       The negotiated agreement shall become part of Business Subsidy Agreement.

Upon roll call vote the following voted aye: Sellin, Berkner, Arndt, Dorry, Dinnel, Reinke and the following voted nay: none.

 

Resolution 04-034 passed this 17th day of May 2004.

 

                                                APPROVED:

                                               

                                                                                    ____________________       

David Dinnel,

Mayor

ATTEST:

 

_____________________

Charleen K. Grossman,

City Clerk-Administrator

 

15.                   Motion approving payment of bills as presented.

 

With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS OF CITIZEN BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS:

Arndt left the meeting.

 

Council discussed the recommendation by the planning commission, Berkner moved and Dorry seconded and the motion passed unanimously adopting the Findings of Fact on the Schlimme variance request as presented by the Board of Appeal/Planning Commission.  Berkner moved and Dorry seconded and the motion passed unanimously approving the recommendation of the Board of Appeal/Planning Commission to deny the variance request of Richard Schlimme based upon the adopted Findings of Fact.

 

Upon recommendation of the Border City Tax Credit Committee, Berkner moved and Reinke seconded and the motion passed unanimously approving the recommendations of the February 2, 2004 meeting for tax credits to be approved for Big Stone Therapies, Inc.- $12,330.00.

 

REPORTS FROM COUNCIL COMMITTESS:

Dorry offered the First Reading of Ordinance (Ordinance 04-04) pertaining to

Installation of five stop signs at the following locations:

South Minnesota and Atlantic Avenue – Stopping South Minnesota

Two stop signs on Fourth Street at Lincoln Avenue

Two stop signs on Fifth Street at Jackson Avenue

 

Upon the recommendation of the Utility Committee, a motion was made by Berkner and seconded by Reinke and the motion passed to approve $476.37 as total payment of the levied utility and snow removal bills for 440 NW 2nd Street.  Motion passed 5-1 – Dorry voted no.

 

Arndt returned to meeting.

 

Additional information has been received from the City Attorney regarding the Waste Management Contract.  Berkner moved and Sellin seconded and the motion passed unanimously approving referring the contract back to the Utility Committee for further deliberation and recommendations.

 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

The date of the council retreat will be 9:00 A.M., June 9th at the City Office.

 

No resolution has been received from the DNR regarding deer control in the City of Ortonville.  No action was taken.

 

The recommendations from Larson-Peterson & Associates, Inc. for the Hilltop sewer project was reviewed.  Dinnel moved and Reinke seconded and the motion passed unanimously approving the referral of the recommendations to the Utility Committee for further deliberation and recommendations.

 

The completion of the new marina dock was discussed.  Due to weather conditions and other projects the installation has been on hold.  Will check with Tim Scherer on a completion date.

 

Arndt questioned when the park board will be meeting, and also if there has been discussion regarding the granite along the Lakeside Park.  Park board members will include the granite issue on the May 20th park board agenda.

 

Council Member Berkner is requesting a letter be sent to the DNR Fisheries to check with the Ortonville Planning & Zoning Committee regarding the zoning of the location for the proposed walleye ground level raceway.

 

NEW BUSINESS:

Clarification is needed as to where the Corn Festival fireworks display will be launched.  Dinnel moved and Reinke seconded and the motion passed unanimously to refer the permit application from Big Stone Lake Area Chamber of Commerce back to them for more information.

 

At the November 3, 2003 meeting the transferring of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization duties to Big Stone was discussed.  No transfer was made at that time.  The same discussion occurred at the Board of Review meeting on April 14, 2004 and upon the recommendation of the board this topic was to come back to the City Council.  Council Member Arndt felt that the City would lose control if this transfer would happen.  He is willing to attend the required training sessions.  A motion was made by Arndt and seconded by Sellin and did pass unanimously to decline the offer of combining the City’s Board of Appeal and Equalization with the County.

 

A donation will be received from a walleye club for four benches to be installed by the City employees on the dock.  A motion was made by Arndt and seconded by Sellin and did pass unanimously to accept the donation for the benches.

 

Arndt questioned the progress of acquiring the Otter Tail property at the foot of the lake.  A meeting will be scheduled within the next month with representative from Otter Tail.  The property is in need of mowing and the City Clerk will check to see who has been mowing the property.

 

The signs on the park dumpsters were discussed.  A motion was made by Arndt and seconded by Berkner to remove the letter from the park dumpsters.  Motion failed 2-4 – Dinnel, Dorry, Berkner, Reinke voted no.

 

 

CLERK/ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS:

Tom Koop and I have discussed the pros and cons in regard to compiling with a GASB 34 audit.  Since we are in the process of changing computer accounting programs, I have been updating the chart of account to comply with the GASB 34 audit.  So if and when this change might occur we would be prepared but will take considerable office staff time for the conversion. 

 

ADJOURNMENT:

There being no further business to come before the Council, Berkner moved the adjournment of the meeting and with no objections thereto, Dinnel adjourned the May 17, 2004 meeting of the Ortonville City Council at 8:25 P.M.

 

 

_________________________________

Charleen K. Grossman, City Clerk-Administrator